COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL SLAB AND METAL DECK COMPOSITE SLAB METHOD TO TIME AND COST IN TRANSPARK CIBUBUR PROJECT

  • Anjas Handayani Universitas Mercu Buana
  • Mochamad Elvan Reza Universitas Mercu Buana
Keywords: Conventional Slab, Metal Deck Composite Slab, Time, Cost

Abstract

in the implementation of the Transpark Cibubur project, especially in Tower C Apartment there are several problems in conventional slab methods including the need for a longer construction time. With some thoughts and considerations, the work method of floor slab was changed from conventional method to metal deck composite slab method. In this research, a comparative  of conventional slab and metal deck composite slab method in Tower C of the Cibubur Transpark Project is the object of research to compare the two methods to speed of implementation and cost requirements. The analysis results show in Tower C 16th to 19th floor for metal deck composite slab method is more expensive than conventional slab method with a cost difference Rp. 137.252.215,54. While in terms of work time, conventional slab method are longer than metal deck composite slab method with a time difference for 25 days.

Published
2020-07-31
How to Cite
Handayani, A., & Reza, M. E. (2020). COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL SLAB AND METAL DECK COMPOSITE SLAB METHOD TO TIME AND COST IN TRANSPARK CIBUBUR PROJECT. Neutron, 20(01), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.29138/neutron.v20i01.49
Section
Articles