Provision of Urban Public Transport in the Samarinda Kutai Kartanegara Agglomeration: Current Landscape and Future Directions

  • Muhamad Syafe'i Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda
  • Tukimun Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda
  • Eswan Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda
Keywords: Agglomeration, Public Transportation, Samarinda, Service Performance, Urban Transport Planning

Abstract

Public transportation is a vital component of city development, influencing economic, social, and environmental aspects of urban life. The Samarinda–Kutai Kartanegara agglomeration in East Kalimantan, Indonesia, is experiencing rapid growth in travel demand, especially with the designation of the new national capital in its vicinity. However, the current public transport system in this region is underdeveloped and struggles with integration, resulting in a heavy reliance on private vehicles and associated issues of congestion and pollution. This study aims to evaluate the performance of the existing urban public transport services in the Samarinda–Kutai Kartanegara agglomeration (current landscape) and to forecast future travel demand and service needs (future directions). It seeks to identify areas for improvement in service quality and to provide strategic recommendations for developing an integrated, efficient public transport system for the region. A quantitative descriptive approach was employed. The study delineated five key zones at the interface of Samarinda City and Kutai Kartanegara Regency using land use and administrative boundary overlays. Primary data were collected through field observations and a user survey (questionnaires) focusing on service performance indicators such as travel time, frequency, capacity, and accessibility. Secondary data, including public transport route maps, fleet size, and ridership statistics, were obtained from relevant agencies. The service performance was analyzed using descriptive statistics and compared against standards. Additionally, a transport modeling exercise was conducted: trip generation was estimated using trip rates (from Institute of Transportation Engineers guidelines) based on population and land-use data, and future trip demand was forecasted for 5, 7, and 12 years ahead (2022, 2026, 2031) using a geometric growth model of population. A trip distribution analysis was then performed to predict future origin–destination patterns among the defined zones. The existing service performance is suboptimal – survey results indicate low user satisfaction, particularly regarding punctuality (on-time performance) and comfort (crowding and vehicle conditions). Average satisfaction scores for travel time reliability and comfort were below 3 on a 5-point scale, suggesting dissatisfaction. Operational aspects such as frequency and accessibility scored slightly higher (around the midpoint), but still leave room for improvement. The dominance of private vehicles is evident: an estimated 15% of commuters use public transport versus 85% using private modes currently. The modeling results show that daily trip volumes in the agglomeration are substantial and projected to increase by approximately 30–40% over the next decade. In 2019, the total daily trips in the five-zone area were about 59,000; this is expected to grow to ~85,000 by 2031, assuming current trends. Trip distribution forecasts suggest that certain zones (especially the one encompassing Samarinda’s urban core) will attract a disproportionately large share of trips in the future, underscoring the need for robust inter-zone transport links. The study concludes that significant improvements in the public transport system are required to meet current and future mobility needs. Key recommendations include better integration of routes across city-regency boundaries, increased fleet size and service frequency to reduce waiting times, adoption of technology (such as transit scheduling apps and GPS tracking) to enhance reliability, and improvements in vehicle quality and comfort. These measures, aligned with national transport policy and sustainable transport principles, are essential for shifting commuters from private to public transport and for supporting the region’s growth. The findings provide a data-driven basis for local authorities and stakeholders to plan an integrated urban transport network that can ensure efficient, accessible, and sustainable mobility in the Samarinda–Kutai Kartanegara agglomeration.

References

Afrin, T., & Yodo, N. (2020). A Survey of Road Traffic Congestion Measures towards a Sustainable and Resilient Transportation System. Sustainability, 12(11), 4660. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114660

Aksa, S. K. (2014). Sistem Jaringan Pelayanan dan Prasarana Transportasi di Kabupaten Mappi Provinsi Papua (Transportation Infrastructure and Service Network System in Mappi Regency, Papua). Warta Penelitian Perhubungan, 26(4), 215–226.

Andriani, D. M., & Yuliastuti, N. (2013). Penilaian Sistem Transportasi yang Mengarah pada Green Transportation di Kota Surakarta (Assessment of a Transportation System Towards Green Transportation in Surakarta City). Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota, 9(2), 183–193.

Bruschi, M., & Gelli, S. (2025). Mapping Public Transport Accessibility for Urban Health: A Spatial Method Applied to Milan. European Journal of Public Health, 35(Supplement_4), ckaf161.1348. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1348

Chatziioannou, I., Alvarez-Icaza, L., Bakogiannis, E., Kyriakidis, C., & Chias-Becerril, L. (2020). A Structural Analysis for the Categorization of the Negative Externalities of Transport and the Hierarchical Organization of Sustainable Mobility’s Strategies. Sustainability, 12(15), 6011. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156011

Fattah, M. A., Morshed, S. R., & Kafy, A.-A. (2022). Insights into the Socio-Economis Impacts of Traffic Congestion in the Port and Industrial Areas of Chittagong City, Bangladesh. Transportation Engineering, 9(100122). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2022.100122

Gutman, S., & Malashenko, M. (2025). The Impact of Transport Infrastructure on Sustainable Economic Development of Russian Regions. Sustainability, 17(9), 3776. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093776

Hermansyah, A., Samudra, A. A., & Satispi, E. (2024). Policy Dialogue: Key Factors for the Success of Transit-Oriented Development Infrastructure 3.0 in Big Cities in Indonesia. Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development, 8(5), 3400. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i5.3400

Jati, V. I. M., & Christanto, J. (2012). Kajian Perkembangan Permukiman Wilayah Peri-Urban di Sebagian Wilayah Kabupaten Sukoharjo Tahun 2001–2007 (Study of Settlement Development in Peri-Urban Areas of Sukoharjo Regency, 2001–2007). Jurnal Bumi Indonesia, 1(1), 1–8.

Ministry of Transportation of Indonesia. (2009). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 15 Tahun 2009 tentang Penyelenggaraan Angkutan Orang dengan Kendaraan Bermotor Umum dalam Trayek (Minister of Transportation Regulation No. 15/2009 on the Operation of Public Passenger Transport on Fixed Routes).

Pamuji, D. R., & Rustiadi, E. (2012). Teknik Analisis Perencanaan Pengembangan Wilayah (Analytical Techniques for Regional Development Planning). Bogor, Indonesia: Institut Pertanian Bogor Press.

Pradana, M. F. (2017). Evaluasi Kinerja Pelayanan dan Jumlah Armada Angkutan Kota di Kota Tangerang (Studi Kasus: Trayek Angkutan Kota T.01, Terminal Poris Plawad – Jatake) (Evaluation of Service Performance and Fleet Size of Urban Transport in Tangerang City: Case of Route T.01 Poris Plawad – Jatake). Jurnal Fondasi, 6(2), 68–77.

Priyanta, M., & Zulkarnain, C. S. A. (2023). Sustainable Infrastructure Legal Policy in Indonesia: A National Strategic Project Approach for National Development. Sriwijaya Law Review, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss1.1108.pp1-18

Pyrialakou, V. D., Gkritza, K., & Fricker, J. D. (2016). Accessibility, Mobility, and Realized Travel Behavior: Assessing Transport Disadvantage from a Policy Perspective. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 252–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.02.001

Riduwan, & Sunarto. (2009). Pengantar Statistika (Introduction to Statistics). Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta.

Roslan, S. N. M., Gohain, K., Mustafa, A. M. A. A., Ismail, M. M., & Kumaran, V. V. (2025). Designing Affordable Urban Ecosystems: A Quantitative Model to Enhance the Quality of Life for the Urban Poor in Malaysia Through Employment, Housing, and Digital Access. Challenges in Sustainability, 13(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.56578/cis130102

Samsudin, I. (2017). Sistem Pelayanan pada Angkutan Kota Rute Tetap dan Rute Bebas di Kota Palangkaraya (Service System of Fixed-Route and Flexible-Route City Transport in Palangkaraya). Jurnal Penelitian Transportasi Darat, 19(2), 133–142.

Setiawan, D., Susilo, D., & Setyadi, A. (2022). Integrated Transport System in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Aspect Policy. 3rd International Symposium on Transportation Studies for Developing Countries, 1000, 012030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1000/1/012030

Suharjo, I. P., Leksono, A. A. R., Aththaariq, M. F., Adnan, U. A., Evangelista, & Priadi, G. D. (2024). Examining Urban Development Trends and Characteristics: Future of Public Transportation in Greater Bandung. 4th International Symposium on Transportation Studies in Developing Countries, 1294, 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1294/1/012001

Sze, N. N., & Christensen, K. M. (2017). Access to Urban Transportation System for Individuals with Disabilities. IATSS Research, 41(2), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2017.05.002

Tahir, A. (2017). Model Perjalanan Siswa SMA Negeri Berbasis Spasial di Kota Makassar (Spatial-Based Travel Model of High School Students in Makassar) [Master’s thesis, Universitas Hasanuddin]. Makassar, Indonesia.

Tama, Y. P. (2021). Integrasi Sistem Transportasi Berkelanjutan pada Kawasan Wisata Ubud – Bali (Integration of Sustainable Transportation Systems in the Ubud Tourism Area, Bali). Jurnal Transportasi Multimoda, 19, 10–19.

Tamin, O. Z. (2000). Perencanaan dan Pemodelan Transportasi (Transportation Planning and Modeling). Bandung, Indonesia: ITB Press.

Published
2025-10-31
Section
Articles